Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Detroit Shuts Off Water To Thousands Of Broke Residents

Detroit Shuts Off Water To Thousands Of Broke Residents

BY ALAN PYKE  

"Detroit Shuts Off Water To Thousands Of Broke Residents"


Share on email

detroit
CREDIT: SHUTTERSTOCK
As the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department moves to shut off water to thousands of residents who are delinquent on their bills, a coalition of activists is appealing to the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights to intervene on behalf of the bankrupt city’s most vulnerable citizens.
Their report, filed Wednesday with the UN’s Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation, alleges that the DWSD crackdown is part of an effort “to sweeten the pot for a private investor” to take over the city’s heavily-indebted water and sewer system as part of Detroit’s broader bankruptcy proceedings.

One of the activist groups behind the report, the Detroit People’s Water Board, notes that city residents have seen water rates more than double over the past decade at the same time that the city’s poverty rate rose to nearly 40 percent, putting the cost of basic running water beyond reach for tens of thousands of households. Earlier this week, city lawmakers voted to raise water rates by a further 8.7 percent.
Almost exactly 50 percent of the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department’s 323,900 total accounts were delinquent as of March, according to the Detroit News (via Nexis), with a combined $175 million in unpaid water bills outstanding. The department announced at that time that it would begin an aggressive campaign of water shutoffs, and a DWSD spokesman said that it has shut off water to nearly 7,000 separate clients since the beginning of April. DWSD mailed warnings about the shutoffs in March, but the People’s Water Board report says that some residents it interviewed either never received a warning notice or had their water shut off before the payment deadline printed in the notices had passed.
One key piece of the activists’ complaint has to do with allegedly disparate treatment of residential and commercial clients by the DWSD. The People’s Water Board claims that delinquent business entities “have not been targeted in the same way as residential users,” a claim the department strongly disputes.
“There are no sacred cows. We aren’t discriminating in terms of individuals or businesses,” DWSD spokesman Bill Johnson said in an interview. “Last month we shut off about 3,600 accounts, both businesses and residential. Everybody is getting cut off who is $150 or 60 days in arrears. That is our policy and we’re ramping up our enforcement of that policy.”
The department has not yet had time to break out the data on water shutoffs by client category, Johnson said, but he hopes to be able to report exact figures on the number of business clients who have lost water access soon.
The DWSD’s roughly $5 billion in debts have turned out to be the most difficult piece of Detroit’s bankruptcy, after initially seeming to be on track for a rapid resolution.Neighboring counties have balked at absorbing the city system into a regional water and sewer authority, and subsequent plans to privatize the city’s water services have beencriticized as too rapid, too costly, and too damaging to residents’ quality of life. The system’s massive backlog of delinquent bills makes it harder to convince anyone, whether private company or public authority, to shoulder the DWSD’s obligations. But if the water shutoffs were aimed at making the department look like a shinier prize in bankruptcy negotiations, they would likely be targeted at corporate clients directly, for the same reason that Depression-era gangsters robbed banks: that’s where the money is.
While the vast majority of the nearly 165,000 delinquent accounts reported in March are residential clients, those private households owe much smaller amounts than the commercial and industrial clients who are delinquent on their DWSD bills. Fewer than 11,000 delinquent accounts relate to commercial or industrial clients. But those delinquencies average more than $7,700 per business, according to the numbers published in the Detroit News in March, compared to an average debt of less than $600 per residential delinquency. Non-residential clients account for almost half of what DWSD is owed despite being less than 7 percent of total delinquencies, according to the March figures. The People’s Water Board obtained a document with more recent figures which shows a similar distribution of the delinquencies but lower total debts to DWSD as of May.
“We are asking the UN special rapporteur to make clear to the U.S. government that it has violated the human right to water,” said Maude Barlow, the National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians and a key member of the coalition that put the report together. In addition to creating international pressure to stop the Detroit shutoffs, Barlow said, the UN’s intervention could lead to formal consequences for the United States. “If the US government does not respond appropriately this will also impact their Universal Periodic Review,” she said, “when they stand before the Human Rights Council to have their [human rights] record evaluated.” A request for comment from the UN official to whom the report was submitted went unanswered.

Groups Appeal To UN to Stop Water Cut Offs In Detroit And Restore Basic Human Rights

Groups Appeal To UN to Stop Water Cut Offs In Detroit And Restore Basic Human Rights

Over the last decade, Detroit residents have seen water rates rise by 119 percent. With unemployment rates at a record high and the poverty rate at about 40 percent, Detroit water bills are unaffordable to a significant portion of the population.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
    • Google+
    Detroits Race Wall
    A neighborhood in Detroit, MI. (AP/Paul Sancya)
    In March 2014, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) announced it would begin shutting off water service for 1,500 to 3,000 customers every week if their water bills were not paid, and yesterday, the city council approved an 8.7 percent water rate increase. According to a recent DWSD document, more than 80,000 residential households are in arrears. With thousands of families now without water, and thousands more expected to lose access at any moment, a group of concerned organizations have submitted a report to Catarina de Albuquerque, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation, urging authorities to take immediate action to restore water services and stop further cut-offs. The report was released by the Detroit People’s Water Board, the Blue Planet Project, the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization and Food & Water Watch.
    “By denying water service to thousands, Detroit is violating the human right to water,” said Blue Planet Project Founder and Food & Water Watch Board Chair Maude Barlow. “After decades of policies that put businesses and profits ahead of the public good, the city now has a major crisis on its hands. It is shocking and abominable that anyone would be subjected to these conditions.”
    Over the last decade, Detroit residents have seen water rates rise by 119 percent. With unemployment rates at a record high and the poverty rate at about 40 percent, Detroit water bills are unaffordable to a significant portion of the population. Many of those affected by the shut-offs were given no warning. The infirm have been left without water and functioning toilets, children cannot bathe and parents cannot adequately prepare food for their families.
    “When delinquent corporate water lines are still running without collection of funds, it demonstrates a level of intentional disparity that devalues the lives of the people struggling financially. Where is our compassion? Where is our humanity?” asked Lila Cabbil, President Emeritus of the Rosa Parks Institute.
    In 2013, Detroit declared bankruptcy and appointed Kevyn Orr as emergency manager, giving him a mandate to get the city back on its feet financially. Orr has since taken steps to privatize the DWSD, and many now believe that the water shut-offs are an attempt to appeal to potential investors. In the Great Lakes region, large, private water companies charge households on average more than twice as much as rates charged by comparable publicly-controlled systems. Moreover, private operation has been linked to poor service, workforce reductions, maintenance backlogs, water leaks and sewage spills.
    The groups make the following recommendations:
    1. We call on the state of Michigan and the U.S. government to respect the human right to water and sanitation.
    2. We call on the city to restore services to households that have been cut off immediately.
    3. We call on the city to abandon its plan for further cut-offs.
    4. We call on the federal and state governments to work with the city to ensure a sustainable public financing plan and rate structure that would prevent a transfer of the utility’s financial burden onto residents who are currently paying exorbitant rates for their water services.
    5. We call for fair water rates for the residents of Detroit.
    6. We call on the city of Detroit to implement the original water affordability program.

    City uses “international code” to evict widow from her house

    City uses “international code” to evict widow from her house

    speronis
    This Week’s Sign the Apocalypse is Upon Us
    By Rebekah Maxwell

    Oh, America. A nation of pioneers and rugged individualism, founded by fearless folk who were willing to brave all of nature’s cruelty, forgoing city comforts and amenities, to settle the untamed land. Just for a place to call their own. Their property. Their home.
    Until we discovered that the government, not the property owner, actually owns all our property…and they dictate what you can do with your home. Because they say so.
    A widow in Florida is facing eviction, of the home she owns free and clear, because she’s choosing to live “off the grid,” without using the city systems of electricity and water. The city says her self-reliant lifestyle makes the home “uninhabitable,” and cited “international property maintenance code” to justify throwing her out of her own home.
    As WND reports:
    Widow Robin Speronis of Cape Coral, Fla., is among the growing number of Americans who happily embrace this “alternative lifestyle” known as “living off the grid.” Robin doesn’t have a refrigerator, oven, running water or electricity at her modest home.
    Most of what she owns was free, donated or bought for next to nothing.
    She cooks on a propane camping stove, and her electronics run on solar-charged batteries. And when Robin needs water, she collects it in rain barrels and uses a colloidal-silver generator to disinfect it.
    “My message was to create, so I created a happy place … a place where I get up, and I’m like this is beautiful,” she told WFTX-TV in Fort Myers, Fla.
    Unfortunately for Robin, her decision to talk to a local TV station about off-the-grid living put her on the radar of the city of Cape Coral.
    The very next day, authorities tacked a notice to vacate the property on her door, despite the fact she owns her home, and is up-to-date on her taxes.
    “A code-enforcement officer came, knocked on the door then posts a placard that says uninhabitable property, do not enter,” she told the TV station in a later interview.
    The city’s code-compliance manager told the station the home was tagged because it doesn’t have running water or electricity – but neither is mentioned as a requirement in the code cited by the city on the notice.
    (You would think the enlightened government officials would be more tolerant of Mrs. Speronis’ “alternative lifestyle.”)
    Instead, city officials cite “international property maintenance code” as a justification for the eviction.
    The ‘international property maintenance code’ is a lengthy set of regulations published by the International Code Council which, although not law, are “available for adoption and use by jurisdictions internationally.”
    Because I guess “Nor shall any person . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” is just too passé. Or is that part of the Constitution that evolved again? Turn your back for one second, and suddenly centuries of private property law are usurped by international policy. Not sure what the “due process” of “international law” is, or how a city government is empowered to enforce it, but they’re going to have to prove it.
    Because Mrs. Speronis is not backing down without a fight.
    A local attorney has decided to represent Speronis for free, according to WFTX-TV.
    Cape Coral told the station if Speronis can prove she can sustain her life and the home without running water or electricity, they may be able to come to an agreement.
    “I’m going to bring this to the attention of anyone who will listen until justice is served,” she said.
    Living off the grid is less about pinching pennies, and more about principle for Robin. She vows to fight any future legal challenges by the city.
    “I’m prepared, and if that challenge comes up, we’ll deal with it,” says Robin. “And if my Father in heaven wants me to be the test case for something, I’ll be the test case for something.”

    And if the city’s trying to use “international law” to force widows out of their own property for being frugal and self-sufficient, then a test case, this most certainly is. Because if we’ve already abolished private property in America, in favor of international/government ownership, someone better call the Marxists and let them know they’ve won.


    Read more at http://stevedeace.com/news/city-uses-international-code-to-evict-widow-from-her-house/#ezc5XShfMbu2qsl6.99

    Santa Cruz red-tag forces tenants to move out

    Santa Cruz red-tag forces tenants to move out

    Landlord, surprised by repair costs, says he sought solution since October
    By Jondi Gumz
    jgumz@santacruzsentinel.com @jondigumz on Twitter
    POSTED:   04/03/2014 05:57:15 PM PDT17 COMMENTS


    Anthony Cruz looks over the paperwork he received from the city of Santa Cruz telling him he had to vacate his red tagged Pacific Avenue apartment as
    Anthony Cruz looks over the paperwork he received from the city of Santa Cruz telling him he had to vacate his red tagged Pacific Avenue apartment as workers tape off the red-tagged building Thursday. (Shmuel Thaler — Santa Cruz Sentinel)
    Santa Cruz >> Tenants at a six-unit apartment complex downtown were forced to move out Thursday after the city red-tagged the building as unsafe a week ago.
    City code compliance specialist Jacob Rodriguez informed landlord Darius Mohsenin via letter March 28 that "beams and posts at the second-story walkway and stairs were dilapidated and deteriorated to the point of possible failure."
    The Southwestern-style apartments are at 696 Pacific Ave., near the Kaiser Permanente Arena.
    Two tenants were upset, saying they got 24 hours notice to move out.
    Anthony Cruz, 38, who has lived there with his 6-year-old daughter for a year, wanted a cash payment from the landlord rather than accept a room in the motel offered by Mohsenin. Cruz said the motel has had drug arrests and he didn't want to expose his daughter to that environment.
    "I'm baffled how something like this can happen to people," Cruz said.
    Jennifer Scott, walking with a cane from her second-floor apartment, said she sprained her back in an explosion and accepted the motel room offer.
    She said the landlord "has a beautiful heart" but "he lets people in and then they turn against him."
    Mohsenin, who is traveling abroad, said he appealed to city inspectors last week for a month to come up with a repair plan to minimize disruption to tenants. He proposed "shoring up of the most critical beams," noting six months had gone by since the problem was discovered by city building inspectors in October.
    Mohsenin said he consulted a contractor and engineer, learning engineering work alone could cost $7,000.
    "I'd have to increase rent to cover it," he said.
    All six units are occupied by tenants with federal Section 8 vouchers, which since sequestration pays $1,141 for a one-bedroom unit, according to Mohsenin.
    "Few one bedrooms in downtown Santa Cruz, or greater Santa Cruz, rent for that," he pointed out, noting tenants who move out would have 60 days under federal rules to find housing or lose their vouchers.
    The city notice of violation orders Mohsenin to "ensure all displaced tenants are relocated to safe housing for the duration of the (repair) project."
    He is required to submit the tenant compensation plan within 20 days and provide written proof of relocation for the demolition and construction phases. Failure to do so could result in civil penalties of $500 per day.
    The city also ordered Mohsenin to: Obtain a permit for demolition of the unsafe stairs and walkway by April 10, submit plans for repairs by April 28, obtain a permit and correct building deficiencies by May 28 and schedule the final inspection by June 28.
    Once the walkway is removed and city inspectors approve, the first-floor apartments can be occupied, according to Rodriguez, the code specialist.
    Chief Building Official Mark Ellis said his staff got a complaint in August about work without a permit, at which time the landlord agreed to obtain permits but did not do so.
    "We are still waiting for (repair) plans to be submitted," Ellis said, noting that staff issued a permit to demolish the unsafe walkway to expedite that work.
    Mohsenin said he gave Cruz 90 days' notice to move out by May 3 because of lease violations and that he is not obliged to provide relocation assistance because Cruz is in arrears on rent.
    Cruz, an electronics technician at Lintelle Engineering before it downsized, said the two-bedroom unit cost $1,500 a month. He said he paid a $480 plumbing bill and electrician for the landlord and replaced a broken window and thus does not owe the landlord.
    City Attorney John Barisone said tenants who are displaced with less than 30 days' notice because of unsafe conditions are entitled to three weeks' rent or 30 days in a safe living situation.
    "It's their choice, not the landlord's," he said.
    If the landlord and tenant disagree, the tenant can seek help from California Rural Legal Assistance, he said.
    It's unusual when the city tells residents to move out due to unsafe conditions. The last case was in 2010 at 390 W. Cliff Drive, an 18-unit oceanview condo complex which was torn down and then rebuilt; most of the occupants were owners instead of tenants.
    *********************************************************************************************
    • The landlord was busted for using illegal immigrants and hiring unlicensed contractors who have no idea as to what they are doing. Every repair is a poor fix on top of a bad fix. Maintenance is horrible and it takes years to get a problem fixed without lots of screaming.
      One child fell out of her second story bedroom window. Luckily she was not hurt, but social services required bars to be placed on the windows so it does not happen again. The bars were never installed and now the family has moved.
      We lost power several weeks ago. Two weeks ago we had a water problem. The licensed contractor was being bullied by Darius to increase the water pressure, against the inspectors wishes. 
      There are some really nice people here and we all get along except for a few problem people that should go away. Now, we have been displaced and living in the Flats in a dump of a hotel when we did nothing wrong.
      Darius sewed what he reaped.
      On top of all this, Anthony is a drug dealer, so his complaints are null and void. He already has daughter taken away from him once this year for being a horrible parent. The police have been called many, many times when his sellers/buyers are hiding in the corner and waiting for him to come home. Recently he got in a fight and hit one of his 
      "guys" over the head.
        • Avatar
          The "owner" Darius's family has owned this property and several others around town for over 20 years. I find it hard to believe he could not afford to repair the damage without "raising the rent" since he collects over $30,000 per month on this one property. Owners like him give others a bad name.
            • Avatar
              Thank you! My thoughts exactly.....these greedy slumlords must be stopped. If he really can't afford the $7,000 dollars then he better sell the complex to a responsible landlord.
              • Avatar
                In this case, I expect the city is the party that bears the most blame. They seem to operate like petty tyrants. Regulations ostensibly aimed at helping renters live in safe places should not punish them by throwing them out of their apartment with hardly any notice. It's mad. I have a friend who is worried about getting kicked out of his own apartment after learning it was red tagged, apparently not even for a safety reason but for some bureaucratic reason, some spat between the city and the landlord which will end up with the tenants being effectively punished.
                  • Avatar
                    The landlord himself admits that he was notified of the problem by the City six months ago. That is "hardly any notice." If the landlord did nothing and did not notify the tenants, I fail to see how the City is responsible. In this climate, where rentals are hard to come by, more and more landlords become slumlords.
                    • Avatar
                      So who's telling the truth, the landlord or the tenant?
                      • Avatar
                        The City wants to force the property owner to sell to a hotelier. Just wait and see.
                        • Avatar
                          This is a good example of Fubar.
                            • Avatar
                              What could be so difficult about obtaining a loan for the repairs???
                                • Avatar
                                  The family is filthy rich. The 1% Kind. They do not need loans, they need a conscious,kick in the butt, lots of fines and many court mandated years of living in there own poorly maintained units with exactly the level of consideration they gave.
                                    • Avatar
                                      Ask Rumplestiltskin- time, rolls and rolls of red tape, and ever increasing costs (time related - cost of living). Very sad problem.